Eventually, I decided that I wanted to play its sequel, so I downloaded it off of Steam this weekend. Its multiplayer was good too, but I couldn't help but feel like it was missing something. It was an insanely fun action game that must be experienced, in particular for its single player. A little while back, I reviewed this game's prequel (Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare), which I hated at first, but then loved the next time I played it. Eventually, I Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2. If you are a fan of Call of Duty, get this game, but not for the multiplayer. I was able to run this on a Pentium core and a Radeon 4550 HD GPU, and the game looked quite good. In the graphical sense, it actually strikes a nice balance between graphics and performance, and has given it a reputation of being able to run on nearly anything. Even when my Internet connection is top notch, I still get the occasional 200+ ping while the host has 0. Most of the players use either the ACR, which literally has perfect accuracy, or an explosive weapon, which have earned their bad reputation. I see tons of reviews bashing the community (which is horrible), but that's not the game's fault, so no points taken off for that. I did enjoy the singleplayer, start to finish, and I replayed it several times going for the Veteran difficulty run. Balance, however, is a major I'm not much of a fan of Call of Duty, but this game, and its predecessor, stands out to me. I'm not much of a fan of Call of Duty, but this game, and its predecessor, stands out to me. Don't support this game, it was my mistake for not listening to the podcast. Skilled FPS are a thing of the past, its all about "nice" graphics and consumer dollars. Did I mention that the hosts get 0 ping, while everyone gets 70+ in every game? Really big disadvantageous if you ask me, not to forget to mention that the nub tubes are still in the game. Stick with MW1 if you are a skilled fps player. Just another console game with a mouse, its all MW2 is. Meeting familiar faces is no longer do-able.
The PC community was completely abandoned when dedicated servers were taken out, its not that the game is garbage really, its mostly that the loyal gamers were completely ignored. The multiplayer on the other hand is complete garbage. The Well, I was always a fan of the Call of Duty games, the only reason why I voted so high was because the single player was actually really really good.
Well, I was always a fan of the Call of Duty games, the only reason why I voted so high was because the single player was actually really really good. All of this for $10 more then PC games go for.what a rip off. Also what would appear to me, having their employees or simply people they pay to blatantly lie saying how good the game is.
Deleting threads and petitions on their forums. Worst of all, IW is ignoring the community, and even insulting our intelligence. Lack of a console to tweak settings or even to display your frames per second!!!! Laggy as f*ck, as expected with no dedicated servers. Oh maybe VAC will detect the PUBLIC hacks, and ban them a few weeks later.maybe. NO dedicated servers, NO kicking/banning, NO choice in what map you play or any other options OTHER then gametype, NO leaning, unbalanced weapons/perks/killstreaks, retarded respawns on overly busy map designs that leads to always being shot in the back by someone respawning or being killed by a camper, cheaters run rampant and are blatant because there is NOTHING you can do about them. Multiplayer? LOL Yeah the biggest fail ever. NO dedicated servers, NO kicking/banning, NO choice in what map you play or any other options OTHER then gametype, NO leaning, unbalanced weapons/perks/killstreaks, retarded respawns on overly busy map designs that leads to always being shot in the back by someone respawning or being killed by a Terrible.